A Sketchy Conclusion?

Image

Although in the past the identity of the woman in the sketch above was doubted by art historians, the sitter has now been catalogued with certainty as ‘Anne Boleyn’, as you can see on the Royal Collection website. Through their research, Bendor Grosvenor and David Starkey feel they have  confirmed the identity. On his website, Grosvenor has now published the evidence which led them to this conclusion. 

Personally, I’m still on the fence about it. Check out the research and decide for yourself.
Art History News — by Bendor Grosvenor 

Posted in TheTudor Blog | Leave a comment

Bishop Fisher’s Home for Sale

You can own a piece of medieval and Tudor history with this home for sale in Kent:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-16053525

The building is medieval, however it once served as the home of Cardinal John Fisher, who staunchly defended Katherine of Aragon’s marriage to Henry VIII and keeping England Catholic. And like most others who defended these things in the 1500′s, he lost his head for it.  

Posted in TheTudor Blog | Leave a comment

Nasty Visitor

As I posted a while back, I’ve been away from this blog for some time while I was pregnant and giving birth to my son. Upon my return today to moderate some comments, I found one in particular that was very disturbing. I sent it immediately to the trash, but now wish I hadn’t so that I could share it here and publicly make my reply.

The reader asked by whose husband I was pregnant and expressed that if I am married, that she is sorry for my husband. If I am single, that it figures. (I assume that means I don’t deserve love.) She makes these accusations because I have stated that I am fascinated by Anne Boleyn and that because she is my “idol” I must be a whore like her.

First, let me say that I am always sad when people feel so emboldened by the anonymity of the Internet that they write horrible, trashy comments. This woman doesn’t know me or anything about my life, yet feels it proper to post nasty things on my blog.

Second, it brings up another issue that I have always felt was a pathetic representation of women in general: blaming the woman for the adulterous behavior of a man.

Now, in NO WAY do I believe Anne, or any woman involved with a married man, to be innocent. However, throughout history, women have a terrible knack for focusing on the other woman involved and accepting the man’s role in the indiscretions.

It’s very biblical. Men are tempted. Men are unable to make good decisions where women are involved because we have bewitched them. Men run the world and women are here to distract them.

It’s even worse that the harshest treatment comes from other women. Again, I don’t say that Katherine of Aragon had no right to hate Anne. She had every reason to despise the woman who was trying to steal her husband. And in the Tudor era, Katherine could not blame Henry outwardly or show anything but complete submission. But even those around the court blamed the affair on things like Anne being a witch and putting a spell on Henry just to absolve him of culpability!

Fine, that was 500 years ago. What about now? Why do we as a society, and specifically women, attack the female and not the male. In fact, many women will even forgive the man his dalliance and stay with him. In my opinion, it is just another avenue of denial. If it makes you feel better, honey, then so be it.

My “idolization” of Anne Boleyn stems not from her adulterous affair with the king (into which I feel she was pushed by the MEN in her life), but from her spirit, bravery, and intelligence. She was outspoken at a time when it was suicide for a woman to be so. And she would pay the price.

Suck on that.

Posted in TheTudor Blog | 5 Comments

Compairing Diana to… Anne Boleyn?

Diana on her wedding day.

I was skeptical when I saw the headline of the story in my Google dashboard. But this story from Fox News (which made me even more suspicious) does make some sense.

Basically, the article draws the comparison between Anne’s short-lived (literally) time as queen consort and Diana’s short life and realization that she would never be queen. Both, near the ends of their lives, concerned themselves greatly with the succession prospects of their children.

Anne Boleyn

History gave Anne Boleyn the last laugh, of sorts, when her daughter, Elizabeth, did claim the throne of England and ruled for more than 40 years.

With Queen Elizabeth II living to such a ripe old age, we are assured that Charles will not rule as long as his mother and Diana’s son, William, will be King of England. If nothing else, Diana was always keenly aware that he number one job was to raise a future King of England.

Now, the article goes on to discuss a movement afoot to proclaim that the first born child of a monarch has the primogeniture (right to rule) whether that child is a son or a daughter. This is where they lost me: the rest of the article speculates that William and Kate could have a daughter and name her Diana–making her Queen Diana I. And that this would somehow be Diana’s posthumous victory.

I disagree. Like Anne Boleyn 500 years before her, I feel Diana’s victory is having her son be the sweet, kind man who gave his fiancee his mother’s engagement ring and will one day rule England.

Here’s the Fox article if you are curious. Read more…

Posted in Anne Boleyn, England, Prince Charles, Prince William, Princess Diana, Queen Elizabeth I, Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of England | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

On This Day in Tudor History: The End of the Tudor Dynasty

Elizabeth I's funeral cortege with the banners of her royal ancestors.

On March 24, 1603 Queen Elizabeth I died at Richmond Palace between 2 and 3 in the morning.

The Queen’s health had remained fair until the autumn of 1602, when a series of deaths among her friends plunged her into a severe depression. In February 1603, the death of Catherine Howard, Countess of Nottingham, the niece of her cousin and close friend Catherine, Lady Knollys, came as a particular blow. In March, Elizabeth fell sick and remained in a “settled and unremovable melancholy” until her own death in the early morning hours of the 24th.

A few hours after her death, Cecil and the council set their plans in motion and proclaimed James VI of Scotland as king of England.

Elizabeth’s coffin was carried downriver at night to Whitehall, on a barge lit with torches. At her funeral on 28 April, the coffin was taken to Westminster Abbey on a hearse drawn by four horses hung with black velvet.

Elizabeth is buried in Westminster Abbey with her half-sister Queen Mary I.

Posted in 16th Century Calendar, Elizabeth, Elizabeth R, England, funeral, Queen Elizabeth I, Tudor Dynasty, Westminster Abbey | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Where I Would Go, If I Wasn’t Pregnant

There was a great little feature story in the Guardian a few weeks back that talked about the type of travel I LOVE.

Thornbury Castle in Gloucestershire was built by William Stafford, 3rd Duke of Buckingham, was the scene of a 10-day stay by Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn and is the only Tudor castle in England to be open as a hotel. Now the castle offers you the royal treatment when you stay with them overnight.

You can sleep in the same room in which Henry and Anne slept and feast on a Tudor-style banquet with 16th century foods and recipes.

Here’s the full article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/enjoy-england/gloucestershire-thornbury-castle-anne-boleyn

And here’s the link to the castle hotel: http://www.thornburycastle.co.uk/

Posted in TheTudor Blog | 1 Comment

On This Day in Tudor History: Mary Rose is Born

On March 18, 1496, Mary Rose Tudor, the younger sister of Henry VIII, is born.

She was very close to her brother, Henry, when they were children—he named his daughter, and his warship Mary Rose in her honor.

Mary became queen consort of France through her marriage to Louis XII, who was more than 30 years her senior. Following his death, which occurred less than two months after her coronation, she married Charles Brandon, 1st Duke of Suffolk.

This marriage produced four children. Through her eldest daughter, Frances, Mary was the maternal grandmother of Lady Jane Grey, who was the ill-fated “Nine-days Queen” of England in 1553.

 

Posted in Mary Tudor, TheTudor Blog | 1 Comment